Archive for the ‘photograph restoration’ Category
5 popular and useful posts.
My photo restoration blog is growing all the time and sometimes too much to read all at once, for convenience I have collated 5 popular and useful posts.
1: In digital photo restoration there are many tools an artist can use to help with their craft. Restoring a digital photo is sometimes very challenging but restoring an original is something else altogether, read here Can you restore an original?
2: One of the most exciting aspects of photo restoration is surprise. You are never sure what you are going to restore next and this photo of a 1900,s Unicycle record is one which ill never forget and had a great story to go with it too!
3: Sometimes images come nearly as long as i am tall! These are normally panorama images, for some examples check out the post Can panorama images be restored?
4: Everyone likes to wake up bright eyed and bushy tailed but what if your eye photos did not turn out as you wanted them, you could try the retouching eyes post.
5: If all of this sounds like something you could do, you could find out how to get started in photo restoration by reading how to start in photo restoration
A customer of mine recently sent me this photo.
As you can see it is faded heavily in the middle due to sun exposure
It’s always sad to see your photos face in this way but all is not lost.
The first task was to see if I could recover any colour at the scanning stage. This saves time if you can scan one image correctly for the outer section and one for the inner and combine the two. This did not work that well as the density of the tones were too light to get close to the correct colours. Abandoning that approach i tried adjustments layers, but they reveal no colour left that can be restored in the center section. The carpet and surrounding background have enough clues to give the colours to paint back into the photo but still the densities need to be changed.
I selected the faded area with the selection tools and adjust the curves so that it resembled the tone of the outer section. To check this was spot on I painted a little of the cushion covers colour, on a separate layer, over the lighter area and adjusting the curves and matched it as close as possible with the darker, outer section.
With the burn tool for shadows and then mid tones, i set about burning the bits of background that didn’t quite match perfectly with the surrounding tones. From here on in I used lengthy techniques described in the previous 2 posts for colourising or adding colour to old photos. The final result is below.
This took a fair while to complete but the result is more than worth it.!
Colouring old photos can be done for as little as £25. The more complex they are the more it would cost. A typical examples is one or two people on a relatively simple background for £25. The above was £75
Ive talked before on scanning for photo restoration but I still cant believe what I am seeing out there on the web.
Photo restoration is an exact science but it can only be achieved if the original image is created as a digital file. This file must be of a certain size in order for the restoration to be made. Digital images are made up of pixels, single points of light and colour in varying intensities. If there are not enough of them the photo restoration cannot be made.
To create a file with enough data photos are usually scanned to a computer. So many restoration websites ask customers to scan their photos at 300 dpi. This means there will be 300 of those tiny pixels per inch. What if that photo was only an inch square? Then it would only have 300 pixels by 300 to restore with. You would probably want that image enlarging wouldn’t you? Alas it wouldn’t be possible with scan of 300 DPI, I’ll explain.
To an ordinary person who knows nothing about the digital world this may sound like techno speak but what it means is that your image is effectively like a roman mosaic. If there is a crack through the images and it has a stain or tear, trying to restore this would be impossible. There are simply not enough mosaic tiles to move around to fill in and patch up the photo.
If the number of pixels in increased for this little 1 inch photo to say 2400 DPI or 2400 pixels along the photos edge this would mean not only would be millions of little squares to restore but it also could be printed in a variety of sizes.
Requesting a scan for a photo restoration from a customer without even asking what they require in terms of restoration size is extremely presumptuous. You simply cannot set this scanning figure in stone like so many of the photo restoration services do. It’s very much like building a house without first working out how many people are going to be living in it. You wouldn’t build a 2 bedroom terraced house for a family of 12 would you?
300DPI would be fine for large images such as those of 7×5 inches or above but again it cannot be assumed the final image is to be the same size when restored. I’ve found that most people want their old images enlarged so they can see more or display them with pride.
Can you lighten my pictures I’ve scanned at 300 dpi?? We haven’t even talked about grain and shadow detail either. If said small image was canned at 300dpi and the request was for “lighten” and “enhance” the detail the image would end up looking like a bunch of pebbles on a beach. The more pixels you have in the scan will enable the shadow areas to be probed and lightened, to squeeze as much shadow detail out as possible without those little pixels showing through as noise or grain.
To summarize, requesting a scan of 300DPI for a 1 inch image means it can be printed at one inch, what if you wanted it 10 inches square? The correct question to ask a customer would be “tell us what size you would like the photo to be and well tell you what setting to scan it at”. Assumptions in photo restoration will get you nowhere, just into hot water when it comes to providing what the customer wants. Always ask and advise, don’t assume when it comes to photo restoration. For more on this topic visit saving your file correctly for photo restoration.