I know that many of your are just reading this blog for a snippet of help so you can restore your old photos yourself, fair play, we all do research! It’s important to research both the techniques and the tools to use them.
This post is more about recent trends we have noticed in photo restoration from our location in sunny green Hampshire. Photo restorations come to us in a variety of ages. Many folks that contact us, have modern photos that need repairing. The age of them is of no consequence to us, just that we can help restore the photos. A big part if this is photo colouring. Many of the photos we restore and colourize cannot be posted on our blog. You probably see great swathes of coloured images on the net, splashed around websites but not so many on this blog. Why is that? We always ask if images can be used on the blog but invariably the restorations are for special occasions and displaying them ahead of time could ruin the surprise.
Note: If you are one of our customers who wanted to have your story and image on the blog please get in touch and we can display your before and after, restored old photo, here with pride.
Other reasons for not displaying images are bereavements, or breakups, emotional reasons. Photos are personal and not everyone wants to share them. Clients come from all backgrounds and when it comes to putting personal old photos on the web, understandably some are very cautious.
There also technical reasons for not displaying your old photos on the web too. In recent weeks in the news, “orphaned photos” have become a big topic of discussion. “Old orphaned” images can be harvested and used for personal gain. Basically an orphaned image is one without any digital tag, owner information or details from where it originated. Old restored photos are not always tagged correctly or contain any information at all. You should always make sure that your digital images are as protected as possible when displaying them. You don’t want you aged family heirloom becoming someone Else’s property. The are many articles about this in the web if you wished to investigate this further.
Digital only restorations are also growing in popularity. In short, a digital file is provided to us by email or file upload and then restored and emailed back. This saves posting photos and any cost involved. There are a few drawbacks to this though. It’s not always possible to have control of the scanning of digitizing process of the old photo from the customer end. In order to properly quote for, restore to a high standard and provide the image in a choice of sizes the scan must be high resolution and scanned correctly in the first place.
If you have any suggestions for future posts please just let us know!
Just some nice old photographic plates described a few blog posts ago “old photographic glass plates” I now have the permission to show you what was in those boxes!
The hunting trip: If you had the money, you booked your transport and gathered a few mates and, off hunting you will go. These were times of men, showing they were real men and what they could do and what “trophies” they could shoot.
It was probably safer to shoot wild animals from up high in a tree, hence the need to build yourself a suitable hunting platform around a sturdy trunk.
Once you bagged your Tiger you could pose for your photo and then have the jungle Sherpa’s carry it home for you.
Jungle Sherpa’s carrying home the trophies. Of course hunting was not limited to tigers, anything that moved, there was plentiful supply back then. Including the Asian bear.
Above is a Boar and the magnificent Leopard
After the animals were shot and carried home they were the prepared for display or sale.
The above images were kindly donated for display by one of my clients. I do not condone hunting of any kind these are simply a record of what used to happen and a photos of historic interest.
To see where these plates came from and what they were boxed in, see my post on “old photographic glass plates“
Could this be a new discovery of an original Daguerreotype of the young Abraham Lincoln?
A newly discovered Daguerreotype was found by Justin Whiting of, Norwich Norfolk United Kingdom, could be a new photographic piece in Abraham Lincoln’s historic life story.
Purchased on Ebay from a power seller of Daguerreotypes Justin was sure it reminded him of someone. He’d been searching for an image like this for sometime. In his mind it could be no one else other than a young Abraham Lincoln!
Was it? Could it be? At a casual glance there is a good resemblance.
He set about the process verifying the image by asking American museums if they were willing to help identify the man in the image.
Images get flipped and faces point in different directions and then get flipped. Why? Because sometimes you see the mirror image of Abe as he was captured on the Daguerreotypes and sometimes these images have been flipped to show the image as it would be if you were looking straight at him. In this case its possible that the mole is on the right side of the left face.
The Find: Justin has always had a great interest in finding photographs of famous historic figures from America. He was taking his daily browse through “carte de visite” or visiting cards on eBay but got distracted by some daguerreotypes. He saw an interesting picture titled “1/6 daguerreotype tinted blue 1840’s”. Justin purchased the item from the e-seller ‘salvatorparadise’, on 29/06/2011 for about $140.
The Daguerreotype showed an extremely tall man in a fine suit. He did a some research and found matching physical details to Abraham Lincoln, like the height and body build, the way his eyes sat differently. In the reference photographs Justin noticed Abraham Lincoln has some defining features like the large bump on his right cheek, his left eye socket was higher than the right. These all matched, even his nose and lips. Abraham Lincoln had a thin top lip and a fat bottom lip, the same seemed to be the case in the Daguerreotype.
He went on to discover other matching features such as Lincolns very different ears, the left side was slightly higher then the right. He also had other features such as his jaw buckled in, on the low right side and his right eye drifted towards his nose, the condition was called ‘strabismus’. It was these matching features that made him believe he was looking at a Young Abraham Lincoln. The final clue was the suit he was wearing, which was completely in keeping with Lincolns occupation as a Lawyer..
The stormy faced scholar. At the same time there was an auction going for another daguerreotype by the same seller which he missed but managed to contact the buyer. This second image appears to be a younger Reverend Owen Lovejoy 1840. “’stormy faced scholar”. He contacted the buyer who was a bit reluctant to sell it as it had been cleaned at a considerable cost. After haggling on the phone Justin managed to obtain the photograph as well. He already knew Owen Lovejoy was a dear friend to Lincoln and that he used to read the bible to Lincoln regularly at his home. The photograph was not in the best of shape even after it was cleaned as the seals are missing. This meant it had oxidised and darkened slowly over time. The facial features are still visible as is the hairline which seems to be a very accurate match to Reverend Owen Lovejoy. The open book in the photo which symbolises the bible as it an open book. Justin believes he is making a statement that this is his passion, he is a reverend and a preacher of the bible.
American’s uninterested. After buying both daguerreotypes Justin contacted some museums in America to present his findings. He was excepting some very positive responses. Instead he was shunned by one museum saying it was not Lincoln and looked nothing like him. They offered no further explanation other than “his hair looks ridiculous”. He soon realised It was not going to be easy, the American museums was very dismissive. with attitude of, here we go another picture claiming to be Lincoln, “we get loads” they said.
Undeterred Justin decided to hunt for someone who can offer a more scientific investigation to match the facial features. The scientific road now appears to be the only answer. He has started proceedings with the facial recognition process. He asked me to help put this blog together to the message out there if anyone can help.
A personal opinion – Why i featured this on my blog?
I feel this is him based on what i can see and line up in my software. The most interesting for me is the ear print match. Ears are unique or so The National Training Centre for Scientific Support to Crime Investigation NTCSSCI says “no two ears are exactly the same”. The ear print for me is the clincher.
Sources Ear prints – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/246713.stm