What is strange about this photo? What do we know about and why is it not what it seems?
I found this image at a car boot sale. What a great photo such grandeur and that hair it looks like it is his and not a wig! Just amazing. I coloured it for this blog post.
What is odd about it?
At first, look it just a photo of some guy in a fancy outfit. The first thing I did was to look up the period in history for this type of fashion. From what I can gather from scouting the web his style seems to come from the 1750s. On its own, this is nothing out of the ordinary but it is when we look at when photograph studios came about in the early 1840s and 50’s this is 100 years later. However, this was for the early types of photographic media. Daguerreotypes and Ambrotypes, this photo is neither and is on actual photographic paper!
What is known about it?
It is printed using the silver halide chemical process, in popular use from around 1870. If we look at the bottom right, this image is stamped by an Alexander Corbett. A search on the web reveals his photography company went on to photograph Royal subjects. His prints also have a place in the national portrait gallery. However, I can find no information about him at all. From looking at his photographic progression in the national portrait collection, a rough estimate to the year this photo was taken would be about 1900. We are now 150 years on from the fashion shown in the image.
Puzzling we have such a sharp image and such grandeur from a time so long ago? Was it a re-enactment, a special occasion and an eccentric Royal who preferred 150-year-old fashion? Who is this man in the photo that Alexander Corbett photographed? What more do we know about the photographer, why is there so little information about him? It would be interesting to find out more about this story.
Are you a sleuth? Do you know more? Please comment below.